<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>No thanks. I'll PaaS. ("Cloudy April" - Part 6)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2011/04/06/no-thanks-i-ll-paas-quot-cloudy-april-quot-part-6.aspx</link><description>Have you looked at Windows Azure lately? It was announced a couple of years ago, released just over a year ago, and already it&amp;rsquo;s the most solid platform-as-a-service out there. 
 You remember PaaS, right? I introduced it back in Part 3 of this</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: No thanks. I'll PaaS. ("Cloudy April" - Part 6)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2011/04/06/no-thanks-i-ll-paas-quot-cloudy-april-quot-part-6.aspx#3419109</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:23:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3419109</guid><dc:creator>disinterested</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PaaS...something rpath did in 2005 and continues to do now. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d say they&amp;#39;re light years ahead of Azure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3419109" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>