<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why is Windows Server 2008 at SP1 already?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2008/02/22/why-is-windows-server-2008-at-sp1-already.aspx</link><description>Many of us were baffled by what we saw when we first installed the &amp;quot;RTM&amp;quot; bits of Windows Server 2008 and looked at the winver results: &amp;quot;Huh?&amp;#160; Service Pack 1?&amp;quot; Yeah.&amp;#160; At first glance you may think it strange that a first version</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Alcune note operative su Windows Server 2008 SP2 e Hyper-V</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2008/02/22/why-is-windows-server-2008-at-sp1-already.aspx#3257371</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:53:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3257371</guid><dc:creator>Security e Virtualization Blog di Feliciano Intini (e il suo team PCfSV2)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ciao a tutti, dopo il primo post di introduzione , possiamo passare a qualche post tecnico :) E' da poco&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3257371" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>More Info on Why Server 2008 is Already at SP1</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2008/02/22/why-is-windows-server-2008-at-sp1-already.aspx#2990515</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:35:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2990515</guid><dc:creator>Realtime Community | Windows Server</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I see the humor in Microsoft making Server 2008 at release already marked SP1. At the same time I see the reasoning why. But as they say, &amp;quot;perception is reality.&amp;quot; What's problematic about this nomenclature is its effect on already incredulous administrators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2990515" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why is Windows Server 2008 at SP1 already?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2008/02/22/why-is-windows-server-2008-at-sp1-already.aspx#2929010</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:28:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2929010</guid><dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;While you might think I'm wrong, it does look a bit suss.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Focusing on the positive, a shared code base is always good, and multicasting rocks :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Dale&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2929010" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>wisefaq.com &amp;raquo; Windows Server 2008 SP1? - WTF???</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinremde/archive/2008/02/22/why-is-windows-server-2008-at-sp1-already.aspx#2927082</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:34:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2927082</guid><dc:creator>wisefaq.com » Windows Server 2008 SP1? - WTF???</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.wisefaq.com/?p=332"&gt;http://blog.wisefaq.com/?p=332&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2927082" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>