<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx</link><description>One of the common questions on NIC teaming is whether special network switches and/or customized switch configurations are needed to fully support NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012. And, the answer is ... it depends! Read this article to find our when</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3570453</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:40:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3570453</guid><dc:creator>KeithMayer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Edward,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The switch teaming configuration in the article above is intended for use with static switch-dependent teaming. &amp;nbsp;If you&amp;#39;re using dynamic teaming with LACP, you should modify the switch configuration above to use &amp;quot;active&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;on&amp;quot; as the channel-group mode by substituting the existing channel-group commands on each interface with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;channel-group 1 mode active&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will configure the switch to use LACP link negotiation across each of the interfaces in the team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keith&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3570453" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3570444</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:19:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3570444</guid><dc:creator>KeithMayer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Shandilye,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Standby adapters are not supported by Switch-dependent NIC teaming to avoid MAC flapping issues that could otherwise occur with the network switch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keith&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3570444" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3570138</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:46:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3570138</guid><dc:creator>Edwardon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I enabled LACP on the switch configuration. The status says it&amp;#39;s up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the windows 2012 server, create an LACP team with 4 members. I see that the status is Faulted - Reason Not found. I see traffic on the 4 members but still faulted. What could be the reason?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3570138" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3568204</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:09:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3568204</guid><dc:creator>shandilye</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi keith , can you tell me why we dont have stand-by adapter in switch dependent nic teaming?? And can it be possible that we can develop it??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3568204" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3534347</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:41:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534347</guid><dc:creator>KeithMayer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ray,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NIC Teaming can be used to increase aggregate throughput as well. &amp;nbsp;Inbound traffic distribution to a server with teamed interfaces is controlled by the switch configuration, so double-check your switch documentation to make sure it&amp;#39;s setup correctly and that it supports teaming/etherchannels and load distribution. &amp;nbsp;Also check that your switch isn&amp;#39;t throttling traffic and that your switch backplane can handle the load you are wanting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keith&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534347" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3534344</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:33:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534344</guid><dc:creator>KeithMayer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sig,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, but if you want to extend 1 etherchannel across both switches, you&amp;#39;ll need to stack them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keith&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534344" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3534027</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:04:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534027</guid><dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been trying to increase by bandwidth from the 1Gb ports to 8 ports in a Team to hopefully give me 8Gb of bandwidth. &amp;nbsp;It beatufully distributes to 1Gb load amonst all 8 ports which makes my switch happy but I want to increase the bandwidth to push Tb&amp;#39;s of data for backups from mutiple 1Gb sources. &amp;nbsp;Am I crazy but I thought the team would increase throughput as well as give redundancy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534027" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3533965</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:54:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3533965</guid><dc:creator>Sigdarkside</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad that I have got there your second post made everything a lot clearer. I would just like to confirm the split team outline below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Creating a channel on each switch with the same number and having 2 ports from 1 team on each is how I split them across?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3533965" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3533930</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:30:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3533930</guid><dc:creator>KeithMayer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sig,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes - you&amp;#39;ve got it! :-) One Etherchannel on the switch per NIC team on a server. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keith&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3533930" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NIC Teaming in Windows Server 2012 - Do I Need to Configure My Switch?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2012/10/16/nic-teaming-in-windows-server-2012-do-i-need-to-configure-my-switch.aspx#3533875</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:52:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3533875</guid><dc:creator>Sigdarkside</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you I think I have got this now you create separate channels per server? as on your second blog you was also using etherchannel for the server uplinks am I correct if I configured the following &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switch 1 ports 1-4 Channel 1 relate to server 1 team &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switch 2 ports 1-4 Channel 2 relate to server 2 team &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Switch 1 &amp;amp; 2 Ports 5 - 6 channel 3 relate to server 3 team&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3533875" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>