<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>You Need to Know : Windows Server 2012 RTM Hyper-V SCALE FINAL...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/justin_gao/archive/2012/09/05/you-need-to-know-windows-server-2012-rtm-hyper-v-scale-final.aspx</link><description>Hi All : 
 Throughout the development of Windows Server 2012, we have regularly pushed the scale boundaries as test resources and engineering schedule allowed. For example, in pushing Hyper-V scale to support up to 64 virtual processors per VM, it isn&amp;rsquo;t</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>