<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How does New-SmbShare know whether the new share should be standalone, clustered or scale-out?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2013/01/18/how-does-new-smbshare-know-whether-the-new-share-should-be-standalone-clustered-or-scale-out.aspx</link><description>I got a question the other day about one of the scripts I published as part of a step-by-step for Hyper-V over SMB , Here's the relevant line from that script: 
 New-SmbShare -Name VMS3 -Path C:\ClusterStorage\Volume1\VMS -FullAccess FST2.Test\Administrator</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: How does New-SmbShare know whether the new share should be standalone, clustered or scale-out?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2013/01/18/how-does-new-smbshare-know-whether-the-new-share-should-be-standalone-clustered-or-scale-out.aspx#3546766</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:14:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3546766</guid><dc:creator>Ahsan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice way to do thanks .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3546766" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>