<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtual Server 2005 R2 and iSCSI</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jhoward/archive/2005/11/10/414179.aspx</link><description>And while on the subject of official Virtual Server 2005 R2 information starting to becoming public , we now support iSCSI for VHD storage and clustering shared storage. Typically iSCSI can be a far cheaper alternative to fibre channel attached storage</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Virtual Server 2005 R2 and iSCSI</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jhoward/archive/2005/11/10/414179.aspx#414183</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:54:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:414183</guid><dc:creator>tony roth</dc:creator><description>ya know that ms could knock the iscsi thing out of the park if you come up with a free target from ms.  I'd say buy stringbeans target so that you'll make some employee's happy. I'm not saying stringbean is the greatest but!!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=414183" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>