<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ADS to deploy Windows XP?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jhoward/archive/2005/11/09/414079.aspx</link><description>I have to admit, I'd never thought of this one. Yes, I've looked into using ADS (Automated Deployment Services) for deploying Windows Server 2003 and use it as part of the Virtual Server Migration Toolkit ( VSMT ) solution but never thought of using it</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: ADS to deploy Windows XP?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jhoward/archive/2005/11/09/414079.aspx#414206</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:36:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:414206</guid><dc:creator>Christian Schindler</dc:creator><description>I used ADS several times to rollout XP Images. IN my point of view the advantage over RIS is, that you can have one image which can be delivered via multicast... But as you already mentioned - it's not supported...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=414206" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>