http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2006/08/28/452158.aspxI think the world of the people I'm working with at the moment, and of my previous manager too. But it wasn't always so. Some of the people I worked with in the past showed me the that anything you say in e-mail can be used in evidence against you: Ien-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2006/08/28/452158.aspx#453180Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:20:03 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:453180James ONeillDRM is not an absolute guarantee. Outlook disables the Print screen key , but what it would have done is prevent Doug Cowie's forwarding of the mail to Malcolm Speed. If Cowie and Speed had talked about it instead of a mail thread starting ... who knows ...<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=453180" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2006/08/28/452158.aspx#452988Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:26:52 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:452988Jim StauntonWhat effect would DRM have had on the email? <br> <br>If the recipient can display the email on their screen, they can presumably either take a screenshot or if necessary a digital photo of the screen showing the email. &nbsp;They can then pass this on to whomever they wish. <br> <br>IMHO the press would have loved the story even more if it was &quot;umpire sends ENCRYPTED SECRET email demanding $$$,$$$ payoff&quot; <br> <br> <br> <br><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452988" width="1" height="1">