<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Good flash / Bad Flash</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2006/06/06/432817.aspx</link><description>I came upon an example of how Flash can be used well at www.seewindowsvista.com . In response to my post about adobe "Mike" said that Flash is a great technology if it is used appropriately - which it is. But I quoted Jakob Nielsen : " Most of the Flash</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Blockers. What would we want from IE 8... or 9</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2006/06/06/432817.aspx#3027675</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:31:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3027675</guid><dc:creator>James O'Neill's blog </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have used this blog to grumble about &amp;amp;quot;Flash turds&amp;amp;quot; - those super-annoying adverts whose determination&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3027675" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>