<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Downloading Windows 7 / Server 2008 R2</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2009/01/13/downloading-windows-7-server-2008-r2.aspx</link><description>It seems it wasn’t just our internal network servers which went into melt down – on Friday the rush to be one of the first 2.5 million to download Windows 7 was more than the exceeded capacity could cope with. On top of that, there’s a rumour doing the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Windows 7 release candidate…</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2009/01/13/downloading-windows-7-server-2008-r2.aspx#3205312</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:40:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3205312</guid><dc:creator>James O'Neill's blog </dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;First up, let me give my usual warning about ship dates. Those who talk don’t know, and those who know&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3205312" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>