<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Quality assurance Vs Quality improvement. Which thinking do you want ?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2007/08/18/quality-assurance-vs-quality-improvement-which-thinking-do-you-want.aspx</link><description>One of the Microsoft internal discussion lists has had an interesting thread over the last couple of days which started like this. Poster: "I know about bugs in [X], but I work on [Y] and all the objectives I'm measured on are based on getting [Y] right</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>hinder &amp;raquo; Quality assurance Vs Quality improvement. Which thinking do you want ?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/jamesone/archive/2007/08/18/quality-assurance-vs-quality-improvement-which-thinking-do-you-want.aspx#2158961</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:22:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2158961</guid><dc:creator>hinder » Quality assurance Vs Quality improvement. Which thinking do you want ?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://hinder.wpbloggers.com/?p=1324"&gt;http://hinder.wpbloggers.com/?p=1324&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2158961" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>