<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Vista One Year Vulnerability Report</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/itproaustralia/archive/2008/01/24/windows-vista-one-year-vulnerability-report.aspx</link><description>Jeff Jones has released the 1 year vulnerability report for Windows Vista. This paper analyzes the vulnerability disclosures and security updates for the first year of Windows Vista and looks at it in the context of its predecessor, Windows XP, along</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Vista One Year Vulnerability Report</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/itproaustralia/archive/2008/01/24/windows-vista-one-year-vulnerability-report.aspx#2983646</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:56:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2983646</guid><dc:creator>Waz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If your running vista with less than 1gb of memory than it's going to be slow...so upsize your ram and your video card.....to get a boost in speed....a CPU under 2.04gb mhz will drain the performance of vista too....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2983646" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Vista One Year Vulnerability Report</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/itproaustralia/archive/2008/01/24/windows-vista-one-year-vulnerability-report.aspx#2981687</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:03:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2981687</guid><dc:creator>Ken Shaw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am currently running Vista and am unhappy with the speed of Vista. &amp;nbsp; It is interesting that Leo Leporte from The Lab said last week that Vista has a new version out and it is better, it is called Windows XP. &amp;nbsp; I tend to agree with this statement but to reverse back to XP is too much hassle and I hope that Microsoft will support us users with free updates that finally fix the bugs etc and give us a great windows finally&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ken Shaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2981687" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Vista One Year Vulnerability Report</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/itproaustralia/archive/2008/01/24/windows-vista-one-year-vulnerability-report.aspx#2830241</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:28:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2830241</guid><dc:creator>Matt Waite</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since nobody is seriously using Vista, its no wonder nobody is trying to hack it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But seriously... Can you present these figures in relation to number of copies deployed? &amp;nbsp;It would make a more interesting and relevant study. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm sure if you added Plan 9 to the chart, the first year of vulnerabilities would be very low; possibly the lowest. &amp;nbsp;But what does that prove?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2830241" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>