TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

re: TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

Johnmen — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:26:44 GMT

In terms of how does TMG determine which IP address is the "smallest", I have found that it treats "192.168.1.100" smaller than "192.168.1.99", probably because TMG compares the IP digit by digit, instead of human's way to compare them group by group. Because digit "1" is smaller than digit "9", 100 is smaller than 99.

re: TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

Davor Niksic — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:22:32 GMT

Thanks a lot, just solved my problem with multiple ip addresses on internet facing interface.

re: TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

Luca Fabbri — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:16:13 GMT

Does the "smaller" IP question apply to DNS Server installed on TMG too ?

re: TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

Ahmet Abdagic — Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:09:44 GMT

Nice topic and very nice explained.

Good Jobs

Best Regards from me and Bosnia and Herzegovina

Thanks

re: TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

Thomas W Shinder - MSFT — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:02:04 GMT

What a wonderfully written article!

The topic is well defined, the problems are clearly explained, and the answers are crisp and clear.

I'm going to use this as a model of effective technical writing.

And on top of that - the topic is very interesting too!

Good job guys -

Tom

re: TMG Enhanced NAT – considerations when using the Default IP Address

MadsD — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:32:35 GMT

What about in array-configurations where the 2 nodes share a NLB VIP address?

Fx:

node 1 has 85.102.140.5 as primary ip in network adaptor settings

node 2 has 85.102.140.6 as primary

but their nlb primary ip is 85.102.140.4

which one is then used when using "Use the default ip address" ??

Regards

MadsD