<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clients are unable to access shares on a remote network when using TMG as VPN Server in a Site to Site Scenario</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/isablog/archive/2010/09/09/clients-are-unable-to-access-shares-on-a-remote-network-when-using-tmg-as-vpn-server-in-a-site-to-site-scenario.aspx</link><description>Recently I came across a scenario where we had a PPTP Site-to-Site VPN between two TMG servers. We were able to access the shares of one TMG server from the other but we were unable to access the shares in the opposite direction as shown in the figure</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Clients are unable to access shares on a remote network when using TMG as VPN Server in a Site to Site Scenario</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/isablog/archive/2010/09/09/clients-are-unable-to-access-shares-on-a-remote-network-when-using-tmg-as-vpn-server-in-a-site-to-site-scenario.aspx#3355092</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:58:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3355092</guid><dc:creator>Suraj Singh MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice work nitin..i guess thats why we always suggest correcting the binding order as in one of my blog posts &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sooraj-sec/archive/2010/09.aspx"&gt;blogs.technet.com/.../09.aspx&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3355092" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>