<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Insider's Guide to Comparative Anti-Virus Reviews</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/industry_insiders/archive/2007/08/20/insider-s-guide-to-comparative-anti-virus-reviews.aspx</link><description>By David Harley 
 There has been a certain amount of excitement and irritation in anti-virus research circles about a not-very-good comparative test of antivirus scanners that was conducted at LinuxWorld on 8th August, 2007. I was so exercised personally</description><dc:language>en-GB</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>AVIEN Guide published &amp;laquo; Small Blue-Green Blog</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/industry_insiders/archive/2007/08/20/insider-s-guide-to-comparative-anti-virus-reviews.aspx#1808474</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:45:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1808474</guid><dc:creator>AVIEN Guide published « Small Blue-Green Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://dharley.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/avien-guide-published/"&gt;http://dharley.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/avien-guide-published/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1808474" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>