As I troll the blogosphere and reporting on Open XML and ODF, I notice a question has surfaced regarding the future of Open XML that is probably worth addressing.
Many have asked or speculated that the recent announcement of ODF in Service Pack 2 is an indication that Microsoft is quietly stepping away from Open XML. Some ask… "Is Microsoft abandoning Open XML?"
In a word, no.
Microsoft will continue to support the development of the specification and the adoption of the Open XML formats, in addition to the other work we are driving around document formats in Office.
I hope this is as unambiguous and clear as it is intended to be.
We will continue to drive adoption of the compatibility pack for Open XML, which has now surpassed 40 Million individual downloads and gaining significant uptake in large-scale deployments. We will continue to ship developer tools, translators, code samples, documentation, MSDN content and other material intended to educate people on how Open XML can help them solve specific business problems. Open XML is prominently featured in many Office Business Applications. Our engagement on the DAISY Translator has been a huge help in the Accessibility community. There are lots of great positives for Open XML momentum.
In the end, Open XML is still the better choice for the compatibility and line-of-business interoperability scenarios we have discussed throughout its history.
ODF also provides us with opportunities for improving interoperability with other products and solutions, and we're happy to embrace those as well. Our addition of ODF to SP2 for 2007 was done for the reasons outlined in my previous post. As some of you have already seen, we've taken a step to engage the community by inviting members of the ODF TC to visit Redmond and take a look at what is being implemented, and we are working very hard to ensure our implementation of the format passes muster with the ODF community (although I must admit I found the spin on that invitation to be a little surprising).
But always know that while we are working on ODF moving forward, we will remain committed to Open XML and believe that it will be the format of choice for large parts of the global community.
PingBack from http://embrace.morelyrics.co.uk/2008/06/24/regarding-the-future-of-open-xml/
I find it interesting that the spinners cited Schulz but did not find it worthwhile to report the original invitation that Doug Mahugh (the Microsoft ODF TC member) made to his colleagues: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200806/msg00075.html
Checking all of the replies there suggests that Schulz's misunderstanding of the invitation was cleared up quickly and there is now a request to provide for virtual attendance for those who are unable to travel to Redmond.
All too common, I'm afraid. Characterizing Doug Mahugh as "Satan" is pretty offensive too. To me this really outlines the difference between the people who get involved in things, and the ones who sit on the sidelines and throw tantrums. I found the discussion on the ODF TC email DL (the facts) to be much more illuminating than what the ex-Novell guy has to say.
At the thick of the heated discussions for the approval of Office Open XML (OOXML), skeptics were always