<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Server DFS-Namespaces Performance and Scalability</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2009/08/22/windows-server-dfs-namespaces-performance-and-scalability.aspx</link><description>The DFS-N test team has completed some extensive Performance and Scalability testing and we wanted to share some of the results. 
 To start, here is a comparison of the performance of adding links to a standalone namespace. It includes data for Windows</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Server DFS-Namespaces Performance and Scalability</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2009/08/22/windows-server-dfs-namespaces-performance-and-scalability.aspx#3276277</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:28:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3276277</guid><dc:creator>Florent</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great. These numbers will be very useful for the implementation I'm working on. Keep the good work. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3276277" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>