<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Debunking Myths about Remote Differential Compression and System Performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2008/05/02/debunking-a-myth-about-remote-differential-compression.aspx</link><description>A number of third-party blogs are telling people they can speed up Windows Update downloads, and file copy operations, by turning off the Remote Differential Compression (RDC) feature on Windows Vista. This is 100% false. Neither Windows Update or file</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Debunking Myths about Remote Differential Compression and System Performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2008/05/02/debunking-a-myth-about-remote-differential-compression.aspx#3051265</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:55:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3051265</guid><dc:creator>TechNet Archive</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some of those myths are kind of amusing, I think :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3051265" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Debunking Myths about Remote Differential Compression and System Performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2008/05/02/debunking-a-myth-about-remote-differential-compression.aspx#3049116</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 10:06:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3049116</guid><dc:creator>Mark Sowul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I always wonder where people come up with such ridiculous ideas (like the myth about clearing the prefetch folder, or setting it to &amp;quot;5&amp;quot; on XP) - besides, why would MS purposely disable things that would benefit performance in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3049116" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>