<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Outlook Web Access - A catalyst for web evolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx</link><description>"The Exchange Web Client" was the first web email client produced by Microsoft. It had an interesting green and black color scheme but it did most of the basic needs for doing messaging. We didn't have enough time to add calendaring support in the first</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Microsoft's Atlas Project</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#420575</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:07:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:420575</guid><dc:creator>coofucoo zhang</dc:creator><description>关注ms的Ajax行为。&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=420575" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>the best u are</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#410146</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:410146</guid><dc:creator>Gergana</dc:creator><description>Your blog is very interesint&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=410146" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Outlook Web Access - A catalyst for web evolution</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407421</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:15:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407421</guid><dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator><description>I wanted to find out why only Basic Experience of OWA is available on all browsers on Mac? I know they are referred as down-level clients but never have seen a good detailed description of why Premium experience can't be provided. I would need a feature list (I know ActiveX controls don't work there, neither XML, but need mroe specific info like why they are necessary and which features in Prem. OWA depend on these underlying feature-set) which is not available in Mac browsers which hinders provision of Premium experience. If someone already know of some public resource, please point me to that. Thanks!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407421" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft and AJAX</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407095</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:52:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407095</guid><dc:creator>Vespa</dc:creator><description>Microsoft and AJAX&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407095" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft invented Ajaxing...</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407029</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:22:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407029</guid><dc:creator>Guardian Unlimited: Onlineblog</dc:creator><description>I've been following Ajaxing for a year or so (since Gmail appeared) and am amused to discover that Microsoft invented it for Outlook Web Access in 1998. Microsoft is also taking it further with its Atlas project: The Atlas Client...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407029" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Announces AJAX Toolkit Codenamed &amp;quot;Atlas&amp;quot;</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#407001</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:407001</guid><dc:creator>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407001" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Weekend reading</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406820</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406820</guid><dc:creator>subject: exchange</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406820" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: @Alternate browsers</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406712</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:35:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406712</guid><dc:creator>Klaus H. Probst</dc:creator><description>I'm sure Jim will elaborate on their efforts to cater to &amp;quot;alternative browsers&amp;quot; if you point out a shipping browser that could actually compete with IE5 in 1998/1999.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW Jim - great entry. I like reading these 'once upon a time' blog posts very much.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406712" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Alternate browser support</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406710</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:08:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406710</guid><dc:creator>Jim Van Eaton</dc:creator><description>We had to almost provide two codebases to support both experiences.  One for the rich IE5+ browsers and another for the alternative browsers.  This is one of the weaknesses of developing rich applications that many of the AJAX developers discuss.  We decided to take a more low risk approach and try and reach as many browsers as we could with the OWA Basic experience.  Going forward, this strategy may change since other browsers have evolved and market conditions change.  I think this topic deserves a separate blog so stay tuned.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406710" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>History of Outlook Web Access</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2005/06/21/406646.aspx#406707</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:31:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:406707</guid><dc:creator>load of tosh</dc:creator><description>My dev lead Jim has a nice history of OWA on the Exchange blog.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; He talks a bit about the early...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=406707" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>