<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx</link><description>Many organizations have chosen to configure a hybrid deployment with Exchange Online to take advantage of different features such as rich mailbox moves and cross-premises calendar free/busy sharing. This includes Exchange 2003, Exchange 2007 and Exchange</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3547891</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:26:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3547891</guid><dc:creator>Mike Crowley</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Important to point out that in many cases, the remaining Exchange server (coexistence server) is free, so its not like customers have to pay for Exchange Licenses when they are using Exchange Online.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3547891" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3546135</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:15:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3546135</guid><dc:creator>ross.at.ormo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for addressing this...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3546135" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3539524</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539524</guid><dc:creator>pesos</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is the hybrid setup going to be less complicated in 2013? &amp;nbsp;It is a bit of a nightmare right now. &amp;nbsp;All we are trying to do is set up cloud-based archive mailboxes (no mailflow) and it has been quite an ordeal. &amp;nbsp;O365 support seems confused about a lot of things, and are passing around internal documents that seem difficult to find because the published stuff is either out of date, or incorrect in many places. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s taken two weeks just to get to someone in support who knows what they are doing, then it took another 72 hours to get a test account archive working - now we are moving on to getting a real existing user functioning and it is a whole other ordeal. &amp;nbsp;Ugh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539524" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3539436</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:28:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539436</guid><dc:creator>Santosh Bhandarkar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539436" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3539147</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:56:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539147</guid><dc:creator>Saigon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;At last, thank you...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539147" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3539042</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:08:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539042</guid><dc:creator>Chris Parker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What a coincidence. We were just having a conversation with a customer today about the decom proces they&amp;#39;ll have to undertake for the hybrid environment after we leave having wrapped up the mailbox migration piece. They would like us to document the process and here you guys made this convenient guide for us to go off of. Xmas came early. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539042" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Decommissioning your Exchange 2010 servers in a Hybrid Deployment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/12/05/decommissioning-your-exchange-2010-servers-in-a-hybrid-deployment.aspx#3539040</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:03:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539040</guid><dc:creator>John Weber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff. &amp;nbsp;Now how about the same article but focused on removing the online component and leaving the on-premise functional? &amp;nbsp;I have several clients who want to move away from 0365 and return to just on-premise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539040" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>