<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx</link><description>Update 11/28/12 : we wanted to let you know that the Forefront Unified Access Gateway (UAG) Product Team team has published a blog post around availability of UAG 2010 SP3 which will include support for publishing Exchange 2013. Update 5/21/13 : The article</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3546638</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:17:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3546638</guid><dc:creator>duddit2</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;EAS Virtual directory set for basic auth, Auth delegation on the publishing rule set to basic, using same listener as OWA rule which is working fine and publishing the same web farm (the 2 exchange servers). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Autodiscover is set correctly as far as I can tell, but this is one of the main differences between OWA and EAS so this could be at fault I suppose. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3546638" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3546636</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:06:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3546636</guid><dc:creator>duddit2</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh also when looking at logging on TMG while trying to connect, I see the allowed connection but it gets a 403 unauthorised message. Same as the analyser tool. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3546636" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3546635</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:05:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3546635</guid><dc:creator>duddit2</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have just setup exchange 2013 and am trying to publish OWA.EAS and Outlook anywhere via TMG 2010 fully patched. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TMG is setup as back firewall, the edge has its own firewall. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It goes like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Internet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edge firewall (NAT)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DMZ (192.168.xxx.0/24) - perimeter&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TMG (dual nic, one in DMZ and one in LAN)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;|&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exchange 2013 servers (2 x servers running all services setup as DAG)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The routing between perimeter and lan is a route and not NAT, OWA on the exchange boxes is basic auth and this simply worked out of the box, no changes needed, but I cant get EAS or Outlook anywhere to work. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I test using exchange connectivity analyser for EAS, it fails on the options command - the error clearly shows the internal URL of one of the exchange servers but the port number has been changed to 444. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the exchange box there is a exchange backend website and this is bound to port 444, but the real client access is using the default website and is bound to port 443 with the correct certs setup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone have any ideas? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3546635" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3538342</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 01:02:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3538342</guid><dc:creator>CS</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Greg,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If KDC will not be supported, is there a way to integrate Certificate Authentication on TMGs for Exchange 2013?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CS&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3538342" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3535358</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:33:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3535358</guid><dc:creator>Astrid McClean MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Jet Microsoft&amp;#39;s Cloud Anti-Spam solution is Forefront Online Protection for Exchange (FOPE) and the next release will be known as Exchange Online Protection. A previous article explains the new product - &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/09/18/exchange-online-protection-a-premium-protection-and-policy-service-for-email.aspx"&gt;blogs.technet.com/.../exchange-online-protection-a-premium-protection-and-policy-service-for-email.aspx&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3535358" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3534906</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:03:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534906</guid><dc:creator>Jet</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;According to what I know the Edge role completely disappear with this version.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So where should we put the Antispam Server in an Exchange 13 architecture ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is Microsoft going to provide a solution (Cloud or Software) ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534906" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3534674</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534674</guid><dc:creator>Cory Wood</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Greg - I just verified that pre-auth is set up. The rule is using Basic authentication delegation. The listener is using FBA and Windows (Active Directory) as the Authentication Validation Method.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Cory&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534674" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3534601</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:33:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534601</guid><dc:creator>WeetA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Greg, it&amp;#39;s not so simple&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No button with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bonjour,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comment ca va ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but the button is present with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comment ca va ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534601" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3534600</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:24:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534600</guid><dc:creator>WeetA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Greg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;well, i found something strange.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bing maps button doesn&amp;#39;t appear in OWA when the body is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comment ca va ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but it appears when the body is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ca va ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It doesn&amp;#39;t appear too when the body is: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;123 Fifth Avenue, Kirkland, WA 98033&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comment tu te sens aujourd&amp;#39;hui ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems that the word Comment (translated from French to &amp;quot;How&amp;quot;) cause the problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you test on your environment ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thx &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534600" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Publishing Exchange Server 2013 using TMG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx#3534593</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:41:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534593</guid><dc:creator>WeetA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Greg, yes web apps are enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534593" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>