<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Released: v19.9 of the Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Role Requirements Calculator</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/06/19/released-v19-9-of-the-exchange-2010-mailbox-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx</link><description>We've made several enhancements and bug fixes based on community feedback. Please go to our Mailbox Server Role Storage Requirements Calculator updates tracking page to see what is in this new version! A blog post explaining the calculator is here and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Released: v19.9 of the Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Role Requirements Calculator</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/06/19/released-v19-9-of-the-exchange-2010-mailbox-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx#3519675</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:35:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3519675</guid><dc:creator>Aaron A</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are still issues with this calculator. &amp;nbsp;Did anyone else notice that the Tier-1 group if you change for instance desktop search value from yes to no and vice versa that the IOPS on the role requirements tab never change? &amp;nbsp;I had to stop using the Tier-1 section and use the other Tier 2-4 which seem to be fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3519675" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Released: v19.9 of the Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Role Requirements Calculator</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/06/19/released-v19-9-of-the-exchange-2010-mailbox-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx#3514309</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:27:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3514309</guid><dc:creator>Ian Martin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi - I may be missing a trick here but I have entered&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Site Resilience User Distribution Model&amp;#39; = &amp;#39;Active/Active (Single DAG)&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#39;Number of Mailbox Servers Hosting Active Mailboxes / DAG (Primary Datacenter)&amp;#39; = 6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#39;Total Number of HA Database Copy Instances (Includes Active Copy) within DAG&amp;#39; =2 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Roles Requirements and Activation Scenario pages indicate 6 active servers in each data center&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; Number of Active Mailboxes (Normal Run Time)	6038	6038&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp; Number of Mailbox Servers / DAG	6	6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but the Distribution page indicates to me only 6 active servers with 2 active databases on each and therefore 6 servers with no active databases. &amp;nbsp;Am I doing something wrong? &amp;nbsp;Is there a bug?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3514309" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Released: v19.9 of the Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Role Requirements Calculator</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/06/19/released-v19-9-of-the-exchange-2010-mailbox-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx#3505196</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:35:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3505196</guid><dc:creator>Jim sullivan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How about fixing WNLB to work with 2010 cas servers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;great job on everything else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;jim&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3505196" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Released: v19.9 of the Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Role Requirements Calculator</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/06/19/released-v19-9-of-the-exchange-2010-mailbox-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx#3505087</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 04:52:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3505087</guid><dc:creator>TirTul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad to see the improvements. I&amp;#39;m wondering if there&amp;#39;s anyway to add scalablity options into the calculator. An example would be, if I started with a environment of 1500 1GB mailboxes, but now need to scale it to handle 3000. Layout a plan to scale out current environment would be cool!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3505087" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>