<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx</link><description>One of the things about Exchange 2010 that many of my customers find very attractive (and I have to agree with them) is the idea of the multi-role or “all-in-one” DAG server. This means having all three of the core Exchange 2010 roles installed on all</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3411224</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:20:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3411224</guid><dc:creator>lawyerwebsites</dc:creator><description>nice.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3411224" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3411045</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:52:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3411045</guid><dc:creator>Robert Gillies [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>Zahid,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry that you're having problems, but this isn't really the right forum for support. &amp;nbsp;Please try the TechNet forums, or call Microosft CSS.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3411045" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3411043</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:40:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3411043</guid><dc:creator>zahid</dc:creator><description>i have a issue when update storagegroupcopy &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;seeding start and aftet that its stop working . in short raplication is working properly&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thansk &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;zahid pervez&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;zpervez@tadawigroup.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3411043" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410849</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410849</guid><dc:creator>Robert Gillies [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>Thanks, Jungseo!!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410849" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410848</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:32:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410848</guid><dc:creator>Jungseo</dc:creator><description>Good stuff&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410848" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410573</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:55:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410573</guid><dc:creator>Robert Gillies</dc:creator><description>Mixing physical and virtual servers in a DAG is possible and supported. &amp;nbsp;The physical server and virtual server in this case do not need to be identical (not CPU, disk, RAM, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What you must keep in mind is that if there is a failure scenario of some sort, the virtual machine must be engineered to support the load expected of it. &amp;nbsp;In other words, if you have a two-node DAG with one physical and one virtual, and the physical server requires 16 cores, then the virtual machine which is limited to 4 or possibly 8 cores will probably not support the necessary load in a failure scenario.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410573" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410560</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:44:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410560</guid><dc:creator>Juanjo</dc:creator><description>Thank you for the post!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a more basic doubt, I want to set an scenario with a physcal exchange multi-role server and other virtual multi-role exchange server, &lt;br&gt;- Is that possible? &lt;br&gt;- It will be mandatory to have same disk space on both servers physical and virtual?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you,&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410560" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410527</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:05:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410527</guid><dc:creator>Robert Gillies</dc:creator><description>Thanks to J.Horton - good answers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To mhess2010, I don't know if there is a best practice guide to automating updates to a DAG server. &amp;nbsp;I think you can script things out to do the failovers in the appropriate order and such, but I haven't seen the processes documented.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410527" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410516</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:02:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410516</guid><dc:creator>mhess2010</dc:creator><description>Thanks Rob.&lt;br&gt;Is there a &amp;quot;Best Practice Guide&amp;quot; how to handle Windows Updates with WSUS and a DAG (mailbox role only) and HT/CAS array servers?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you in advance of your help.&lt;br&gt;Regards Michael&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410516" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Patching the Multi-Role Server DAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/07/22/patching-the-multi-role-server-dag.aspx#3410509</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:01:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3410509</guid><dc:creator>J.Horton</dc:creator><description>Yongrak:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'Activation Block Server 3' means to stop all the databases on 'Server3' from automatically activating in the event of a failover, as you'll be patching.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Set-MailboxServer –identity Server3 –DatabaseCopyAutoActivationPolicy Blocked&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lonwa:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Drainstop is a NLB command which allows the host to continue servicing active connections, but disables all new traffic to that host.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3410509" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>