Sign in
Evan Dodds - Microsoft Exchange Server Blog
Exchange, Exchange administration stuff, and other assorted ramblings
Tags
Cross-site Moves
Exchange 2003 SP1
Exchange 2003 SP2
Exchange 2007
Exchange Clustering
Exchange Online
Exchange14
ExchangeLabs
Pages
Powershell
Rich Coexistence
TechEd
Timezones
Browse by Tags
TechNet Blogs
>
Evan Dodds - Microsoft Exchange Server Blog
>
All Tags
>
exchange 2003 sp1
Tagged Content List
Blog Post:
Using PowerShell + WMI to manage legacy Exchange
evand_microsoft.com
Dmitry blogs all about it here . I'd been meaning to write pretty much this very same post ever since I attended Devin 's talk on managing Legacy Exchange with PowerShell at ExchangeConnections last November this past April , so I'm glad to see Dmitry write it up!
on
10 Sep 2007
Blog Post:
How to find out which users have the Junk E-mail rule enabled
evand_microsoft.com
I received an email the other day from someone who had read my “ IMF and the Junk E-Mail folder in Outlook ” posting. This person was wondering: “How can I tell who does and doesn’t have this per-mailbox setting enabled?” and I replied that there’s no built-in way...
on
31 Mar 2006
Blog Post:
Can't run Exdeploy after installing W2k3 SP1?
evand_microsoft.com
Here’s an interesting problem: After you apply Windows 2003 SP1, the new security settings prevent running HTA files from a network share. So this means if you download the Exdeploy pack and dump it into a network share, it won’t work properly on a W2k3 SP1 server. The workaround, of course, is to...
on
4 Jul 2005
Blog Post:
Cross-site moves: The importance of proper ADC Connection Agreements
evand_microsoft.com
It’s now been about a year since Exchange 2003 SP1 released, and cross-site, mixed-mode mailbox moves were introduced. In that time, I think folks have really started to get the hang of how it works and what needs to be in place to ensure successful moves. That said, there’s one topic that I’ve seen...
on
24 May 2005
Blog Post:
Hotfix for E2k3 on W2k3 SP1 cluster
evand_microsoft.com
Gerod points out in this blog post that if you install Windows 2003 SP1 onto your Exchange 2003 cluster nodes, you’ll need to install the hotfix in KB.841561 . If you don’t apply this hotfix, users will not be able to access OWA (they will receive 500 – internal server error), although Administrator...
on
30 Mar 2005
Blog Post:
Funky mail routing after cross-site mailbox moves
evand_microsoft.com
When you move mailboxes across mixed-mode site boundaries with the Exchange 2003 SP1 feature, there is a period of time where mail will have trouble routing properly to these moved mailboxes. There are a couple of ways you may see this presented, as I’ll discuss in this post. The most common case is...
on
17 Mar 2005
Blog Post:
Couple of Interesting KBs
evand_microsoft.com
Here are a couple of interesting KBs that have come out or been updated recently: KB.884863 ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/884863 ) – “Update to Exchange 2000 Server adds application event logging for deletion of public folders” An additional feature that is related to public...
on
16 Mar 2005
Blog Post:
Hotfix for scripted cross-site mixed-mode moves!
evand_microsoft.com
Thanks to Dave Howe for pointing out this newly released hotfix. With the release of KB.883652 , it’s now possible to script cross-site mixed-mode moves based on the Exchange 2003 SP1 feature. Before applying this hotfix, if you are doing scripted moves with the MoveMailbox method of the IMailboxStore...
on
4 Feb 2005
Blog Post:
Updated IMF filter released today!
evand_microsoft.com
Hot off the presses, there’s a filter update for the Exchange Intelligent Message Filter that released today. You can download this updated filter at: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=c1ea8cf1-48c9-4e43-a4eb-82d9a83fd4a7&displaylang=en . See the Readme for more info...
on
2 Feb 2005
Blog Post:
IMF and the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook
evand_microsoft.com
I’ve posted several IMF-related blog postings in the past — here , here , and here . In these posts, I’ve focused mainly on the gateway behavior of the IMF. This is because that’s really what the IMF is, of course… just the gateway behavior. But when your mailbox server is running Exchange 2003 or better...
on
31 Jan 2005
Blog Post:
More DS/IS prerequisite validation info for cross-site, Exchange mixed mode mailbox moves
evand_microsoft.com
Back in July of last year, I posted about how the DS/IS hotfix prereq check works and why you need to apply it. Since that time, I’ve run into one other item I wanted to talk about in the process that I didn’t provide enough detail on in the original post. Here’s a recap of the “check for the DS/IS hotfix...
on
25 Jan 2005
Blog Post:
I installed the roll-up, why does it still say I'm running SP3?!
evand_microsoft.com
Ok, so that title sort of says it all. You’ll find that installing a roll-up hotfix onto an Exchange 2000 or 2003 server may not update the display in the Exchange System Manager to reflect the new version. So what’s really going on? For example, an Exchange 2000 SP3 server is going to display...
on
5 Jan 2005
Blog Post:
KB.841765 Ex55 Post-Sp4 hotfix re-released
evand_microsoft.com
The "Exchange 5.5 Post-SP4 Rollup" ( KB.841765 ) containing the DS/IS Hotfix required for Exchange 2003 SP1 Site Consolidation work (see my earlier posting ) has been updated as of December 16, 2004. If you've been looking for it, you can now download the updated version here .
on
16 Dec 2004
Blog Post:
Evan gets a mention in Redmond Mag
evand_microsoft.com
Wow, this is a pretty cool scenario. I'm sitting on a plane, diligently reading my December 2004 Redmond Magazine . I flip the page and there's an article on Exchange 2003 consolidation. Here's where it gets good... Reading through the article by Bill Boswell, I think to myself - " wow, this sure sounds...
on
13 Dec 2004
Blog Post:
Cross-AG moves and ADC version upgrades
evand_microsoft.com
If you've tried to do Exchange 2003 SP1 cross-AG mixed-mode moves, you've (hopefully!) realized that you need to meet a bunch of prereqs before you can proceed. The Site Consolidation Overview KB ( KB.843104 ) lists these various prereqs, but here is the short version again for reference: Upgrade all...
on
22 Nov 2004
Blog Post:
IMF on machines with 15 character names
evand_microsoft.com
If you're running Intelligent Message Filter (IMF) on an Exchange server with a 15 character servername (for instance, if your gateway with IMF installed is called ABCDEFGHIJKLMNO ), you may have noticed that IMF doesn't process the inbound messages. This is because IMF does not bind properly to a server...
on
9 Sep 2004
Blog Post:
Technet article on new Recover Mailbox Data wizard in Exchange 2003 SP1
evand_microsoft.com
I completely forgot to post this link when it first went live in mid-July! Better late than never, have a look at my Technet article on the new " Recover Mailbox Data wizard " introduced in Exchange 2003 SP1. This is the new feature built-into the Exchange System Manager GUI that allows you to bypass...
on
5 Sep 2004
Blog Post:
So what if the "stub" objects never go away?
evand_microsoft.com
A while back, I wrote a blog post about verifying that you are ready to remove the source site after undergoing the process of SP1 mixed-mode site consolidation. See here for that intro. Since that post, I've run into a few questions about what to do if these validations never pass. Suppose you keep...
on
5 Sep 2004
Blog Post:
Configure IMF gateway settings per server?
evand_microsoft.com
Someone sent me email the other day asking about the global configuration of the Intelligent Message Filter (IMF). " Is there anyway to configure the IMF settings at the Admin Group level or something less than global ," they asked. Well, it turns out there is a way to configure the IMF (or at least...
on
5 Sep 2004
Blog Post:
New Domain Rename (Rendom.exe) tools released
evand_microsoft.com
Windows group released an updated set of Domain Rename tools last week -- download here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/downloads/domainrename.mspx . You'll still need to understand and follow the steps for the XDR-FIXUP utility . Note the required Exchange version information from the website...
on
25 Aug 2004
Blog Post:
Do I really need to run the Exchange/Outlook Profile Redirector (ExProfRe)?
evand_microsoft.com
Recent newsgroup posting caught my eye: I've done cross sites moves today from 5.5 servers to 2003SP1 servers. The documentation says I need the exprofre.exe tool to update the Outlook profiles. But I don't need it, the profile connect automatically to the new server in the other administrative group...
on
24 Aug 2004
Blog Post:
Should I use the SP1 cross-site moves?
evand_microsoft.com
First, my apologies to the folks I'd planned to grab lunch with while I've been out in Redmond these past few weeks. The project I'm working on has been keeping me much busier than I had expected. Maybe next time! Onward -- Someone commented a few weeks ago on an earlier post: a question about site consolidation...
on
24 Aug 2004
Blog Post:
Updated "Exchange 2003: Management Pack Configuration Utility" released
evand_microsoft.com
A new version of the configuration utility is now posted on the web http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21E5A788-5993-40A9-BD35-B14D414E3E16&displaylang=en IMPORTANT : Before installing the new version of the configuration utility (configapp.msi) the user MUST remove the previous...
on
28 Jul 2004
Blog Post:
Problems registering E2kdsn.dll during upgrade to Exchange 2003 SP1
evand_microsoft.com
I've replied to this question a handful of times in the newsgroups, so perhaps there's a need to post the solution here as well. This is evidently happening to a number of people out there. When you upgrade your Exchange 2003 server to Exchange 2003 SP1, lots of the Exchange binaries get upgraded...
on
22 Jul 2004
Blog Post:
How can I upgrade the ADC to SP1?
evand_microsoft.com
In order to to Exchange 2003 SP1 Site Consolidation (ie - cross-site/cross-administrative group moves), we require that the Active Directory Connector (ADC) be upgraded to Exchange 2003 SP1 level. In the webcast I did on Tuesday , I talked a bit about why we have this requirement, but the short version...
on
22 Jul 2004
Page 1 of 2 (42 items)
1
2