http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/archive/2009/06/22/introducing-uag-directaccess-solution.aspxAs the PM lead responsible for the UAG DirectAccess, I’m proud to present our solution based on the new and exciting technology introduced by Windows 7 Direct Access. If you want to learn more about this technology click here . Microsoft Forefronten-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/archive/2009/06/22/introducing-uag-directaccess-solution.aspx#3318223Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:16:37 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3318223Nejc<p>Actually NAT-PT is not in draft, it has been made deprecated by RFC 4966. NAT64 and DNS64, however, are fresh Internet Drafts currently, waiting to become RFCs. So, will Microsoft switch to NAT64 and DNS64 after they become standard and let the obsolete NAT-PT go?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3318223" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/archive/2009/06/22/introducing-uag-directaccess-solution.aspx#3267824Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:25:21 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3267824Stanislas Quastana<p>NAT64 and DNS64 (NAT-PT and DNS-ALG) are currently not standardized by IETF and are still in draft (cf. <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-03">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-03</a>) so is there now known issues of using it (compatibility problems, scaling performances...) ?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3267824" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/archive/2009/06/22/introducing-uag-directaccess-solution.aspx#3259179Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:46:26 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259179MeirM [MSFT]<p>DirectAccess authentication is done is the very low levels of the OS so currently it is not possible to use other types of authentication.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3259179" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/archive/2009/06/22/introducing-uag-directaccess-solution.aspx#3258613Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:59:44 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3258613Gary G<p>Does UAG support other strong auth options for DA in addition to smart cards (e.g. SecurID token...)?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3258613" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/edgeaccessblog/archive/2009/06/22/introducing-uag-directaccess-solution.aspx#3257398Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:45:07 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3257398David Feng<p>You rock ! This is definitely the most exicting news I have ever heard for the past of months. we are alredying using DA and woulld like to integrate with UAG to extend the functionalities of DA.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3257398" width="1" height="1">