<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Client Management Blog by Dominik Heinz - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/</link><description>Blog about Systems Management, Deployment and Operations.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: SCCM PXE Network Boot Process</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/03/18/sccm-pxe-network-boot-process.aspx#3569347</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:36:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3569347</guid><dc:creator>skyman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The handshake is flawed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everything below the following line look rushed and not correct, must have been a last minute deadline and nobody verified this as correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;DHCP Ack &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;· Server ack from PXE server including options 66 and 67 (send WDSNBP) &amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since when do DHCP servers send files...or did they forget to mention this was sent via tftp?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3569347" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Deploying Custom .MSU Updates with SCCM (and SCUP)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/10/17/deploying-custom-msu-updates-with-sccm-and-scup.aspx#3553467</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:00:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3553467</guid><dc:creator>CoreyC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Was there ever an answer as to why DISM is used instead of WUSA? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3553467" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SCCM Report Cannot be Displayed–Error 500</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/09/08/sccm-report-cannot-be-displayed-error-500.aspx#3550315</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:45:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3550315</guid><dc:creator>sccm reports error 500</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;this poet was very helpful, it worked for me but I make changes in &amp;quot;Default Web Site / ASP / limits Properties / Response Bufferung Limit. and the SMSReporting-SiteName / ASP/limits Properties / Response Bufferung Limit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;now no more error 500.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3550315" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Deploying Custom .MSU Updates with SCCM (and SCUP)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/10/17/deploying-custom-msu-updates-with-sccm-and-scup.aspx#3534169</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:58:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534169</guid><dc:creator>OdgeUK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My Bad. Cab file, when run properly using DISM, will populate the Installed Updates Control Panel details.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534169" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Deploying Custom .MSU Updates with SCCM (and SCUP)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/10/17/deploying-custom-msu-updates-with-sccm-and-scup.aspx#3533947</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:54:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3533947</guid><dc:creator>OdgeUK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Make sure that you populate the namespace field (above the wmi query) with root\cimv2. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3533947" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Deploying Custom .MSU Updates with SCCM (and SCUP)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/10/17/deploying-custom-msu-updates-with-sccm-and-scup.aspx#3533574</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:50:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3533574</guid><dc:creator>OdgeUK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Further to the above, it seems that if you use iExpress to install your newly created EXE, it will remove the CAB file once run. The problem with this is that if you then need to uninstall the update, you need to run DISM remove-package against the Cab file, which no longer exists. Any workaround?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3533574" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Deploying Custom .MSU Updates with SCCM (and SCUP)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/10/17/deploying-custom-msu-updates-with-sccm-and-scup.aspx#3533300</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:00:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3533300</guid><dc:creator>OdgeUK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have noticed that when installing Updates using this method, no entry is place under &amp;quot;Installed Updates&amp;quot; under Control Panel&amp;gt; Programs and Features. I guess that&amp;#39;s something to do with the work-around method of installing using DISM? Can make it a little tricky to prove that the install is completed once the EXE is run and not ideal for support people who use that GUI to confirm if updates are installed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3533300" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SCCM PXE Network Boot Process</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/03/18/sccm-pxe-network-boot-process.aspx#3524728</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:44:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3524728</guid><dc:creator>sipp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What if the DHCP Option 250 is missing from the DHCP Request going to the SCCM PXE SP? What could be the reason for this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We currently have this issue at one location. The SCCM PXE SP is used successfully at other locations as well as the client.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any help is appreciated....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3524728" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SCCM PXE Network Boot Process</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/03/18/sccm-pxe-network-boot-process.aspx#3520219</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:58:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520219</guid><dc:creator>James McDonald</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What if everything goes well, until it tries to download the pxeboot.n12 file, and all it does is this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TFTP Download: &amp;nbsp;smsboot\x64\pxeboot.n12&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TFTP Download: &amp;nbsp;smsboot\x64\pxeboot.n12&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TFTP Download: &amp;nbsp;smsboot\x64\pxeboot.n12&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;over and over, and it never downloads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520219" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: DHCP &amp; PXE basics</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dominikheinz/archive/2011/03/18/dhcp-amp-pxe-basics.aspx#3517556</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 09:20:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3517556</guid><dc:creator>Santosh Bhandarkar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3517556" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>