<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx</link><description>In a fast evolving new world of data you need immediate answers to any question you ask about your business. Imagine the possibilities of being able to analyze 7 billion rows of data in seconds to generate an insight that moves the business forward. Companies</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3506748</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:32:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3506748</guid><dc:creator>Dog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;TM1 had in-memory far before QlikView&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3506748" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3506482</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:15:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3506482</guid><dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice feature stolen from Qlikview...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3506482" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3500054</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:55:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3500054</guid><dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to capacity plan for xVelocity in-memory engine? &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve been looking for some calculations but haven&amp;#39;t found anything so far. &amp;nbsp;Based on the source data table I would like to know the expected memory requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3500054" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3499356</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:10:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3499356</guid><dc:creator>mbourgon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;BA: here&amp;#39;s the link from MS. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve been digging through it since I have to do the same thing. &amp;nbsp;Good luck!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/5069.add-data-to-a-table-with-a-columnstore-index-using-partition-switching.aspx"&gt;social.technet.microsoft.com/.../5069.add-data-to-a-table-with-a-columnstore-index-using-partition-switching.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3499356" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3499345</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:24:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3499345</guid><dc:creator>mbourgon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;BA: if you can partition your fact table, then you&amp;#39;re still good, but it&amp;#39;ll take some work. &amp;nbsp;If you haven&amp;#39;t already, partition your fact table. &amp;nbsp;Now create a columnstore on the fact table. &amp;nbsp;Nightly, instead of loading into the fact table directly, load into a staging table, add columnstore index to the staging table, and the SWITCH into your main fact table. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3499345" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3495389</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 05:32:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3495389</guid><dc:creator>BA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With columnstore index i cant insert the data which means i have to disable and enable the columstore index what about the time it takes to on and off i have more than 200 million records in different facts tables &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;how does this helps ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;meet2bhasker@gmail.com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3495389" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3489937</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:16:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3489937</guid><dc:creator>TejasJ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Intresting new feature..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3489937" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Introducing xVelocity in-memory technologies in SQL Server 2012 for 10-100X performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2012/03/08/introducing-xvelocity-in-memory-technologies-in-sql-server-2012-for-10-100x-performance.aspx#3488221</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:13:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3488221</guid><dc:creator>bob mick</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is xVelocity also now the PowerPivot for Excel engine?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3488221" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>