<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL Server Data Warehouse performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2007/12/04/sql-server-data-warehouse-performance.aspx</link><description>One of the areas of SQL Server 2008 that I am excited about is the investment we have made in increasing the performance for Data Warehouse workloads. Keep in mind - that we have several customers with multi terabyte data warehouses already on SQL Server</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>British Films of the 20th Century  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; SQL Server Data Warehouse performance</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/dataplatforminsider/archive/2007/12/04/sql-server-data-warehouse-performance.aspx#2611216</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:57:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2611216</guid><dc:creator>British Films of the 20th Century  » Blog Archive   » SQL Server Data Warehouse performance</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blgmovie.com/?p=1789"&gt;http://blgmovie.com/?p=1789&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2611216" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>