See all of the top support solutions for our most common issues here
We always seem to get a lot of questions regarding how to configure Configuration Manager 2007 for the best performance and while we've had this information published in TechNet for a while I thought it would be worth a mention here. Whether you're setting up ConfigMgr 2007 for the first time or you have an implementation that's been up and running for years, you'll probably find something valuable here:
The topics in this section provide performance recommendations that are the result of testing scenarios based on data processing for a central site, with the maximum number of 200,000 supported clients in a Configuration Manager hierarchy, and 2 child primary sites, with the maximum number of 100,000 supported assigned clients each in a Configuration Manager site.
For more information about capacity planning for Configuration Manager site systems, see Configuration Manager Site Capacity Planning.
Note : This is not a complete listing of every feature and function implemented during performance testing but rather an example of general performance testing objectives. For more information about common Configuration Manager 2007 performance related questions and sample configurations, see the technical whitepaper at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=113136.
Before performance testing began, to obtain realistic performance metrics, the Configuration Manager site database was populated with a representative set of Configuration Manager objects.
For each primary site, supporting 100,000 clients, the database size was approximately 40 GB after the initial Configuration Manager object data was imported into the site database.
To continue reading see Configuring Configuration Manager Sites for Best Performance.
J.C. Hornbeck | System Center Knowledge Engineer
The App-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/appv/ The WSUS Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/sus/ The SCMDM Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/mdm/ The ConfigMgr Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/configurationmgr/ The SCOM 2007 Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/operationsmgr/ The SCVMM Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/scvmm/ The MED-V Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/medv/ The DPM Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/dpm/ The OOB Support Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/oob/ The Opalis Team blog: http://blogs.technet.com/opalis The Service Manager Team blog: http: http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager The AVIcode Team blog: http: http://blogs.technet.com/b/avicode
G'day J.C. ,
great article - as usual - and as an MCT I always refer my students to this Blog, it's a great repository and a really good RSS feed to add to email. I do have an issue with the link to the whitepaper, mainly because it does seem fairly out of date:
"All site systems roles are running 32-bit Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition SP2."
"SQL Server 2005 SP2 and Windows Server Update Services 3.0."
Is there anything that would show how much performance has increased when using Server 2008 R2 with SQL 2008 R2 and WSUS 3.1?