<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Random thoughts of an Exchange PFE - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/</link><description>This blog is my effort to document and share interesting details about Exchange Server as I come across them in field, lab and community.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Script to configure static ports on Exchange Server 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2011/10/21/script-to-configure-static-ports-on-exchange-server-2010.aspx#3549318</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:43:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3549318</guid><dc:creator>Bhargav Shukla [KEMP]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nauman,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which other ports are they listening on? THey shouldn&amp;#39;t be listening on other ports after the change and service restart.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bhargav&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3549318" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Script to configure static ports on Exchange Server 2010</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2011/10/21/script-to-configure-static-ports-on-exchange-server-2010.aspx#3549190</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3549190</guid><dc:creator>Nauman</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Bhargav, I did a &amp;quot;Netstat -nab&amp;quot; which showed the RCP CA and the Address Book services listening on the specified static ports but I see that they were also listening on some other ports. Is that normal and OK? Or does it mean something hasn&amp;#39;t been configured correctly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3549190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New pre-requisites for Exchange 2010 Service Pack 2 and CAS Role</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2011/12/06/new-pre-requisites-for-exchange-2010-service-pack-2-and-cas-role.aspx#3536173</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:57:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3536173</guid><dc:creator>Rajkumar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Paul,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the Exchange 2010 TechNet links are updated to match\refer Exchange 2013 articles (happened on Nov 1st week), If you want to check the same for older versions, Click on other versions and select Exchange 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3536173" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New pre-requisites for Exchange 2010 Service Pack 2 and CAS Role</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2011/12/06/new-pre-requisites-for-exchange-2010-service-pack-2-and-cas-role.aspx#3534763</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:34:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534763</guid><dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Exchange 2010 Prerequisites link is wrong - it points to the Exchange 2013 page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534763" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: How to revert changes made by Enable-PSRemoting?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2011/04/28/how-revert-changes-made-by-enable-psremoting.aspx#3534440</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 07:32:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3534440</guid><dc:creator>R.Alikhani</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3534440" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Leaving Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2012/09/28/leaving-microsoft.aspx#3525068</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:19:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3525068</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Miller</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Best of luck to you Bhargav!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3525068" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Leaving Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2012/09/28/leaving-microsoft.aspx#3523190</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:11:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3523190</guid><dc:creator>Adnan Rafique</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;All the best Bhargav !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3523190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Leaving Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2012/09/28/leaving-microsoft.aspx#3523139</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:04:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3523139</guid><dc:creator>Srikanth Kammadanam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Very Inspiring. Good Luck for your new Product.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3523139" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Leaving Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2012/09/28/leaving-microsoft.aspx#3523113</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:50:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3523113</guid><dc:creator>Scott Schnoll</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It was awesome working with you these past several years! &amp;nbsp;Best of success in your new endeavors!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3523113" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: If Retention Tags weren’t confusing…</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/bshukla/archive/2012/06/08/if-retention-tags-weren-t-confusing.aspx#3520660</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:13:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520660</guid><dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have retention policies enabled for the deleted items folder, it deletes anything older than 10 days. &amp;nbsp;We recently noticed that if someone deletes a contact, it will sit in the deleted items folder until it is manually removed. &amp;nbsp;The reason being that contact items are not designed to have retention tags assigned to them.... Not the end of the world, but pretty annoying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520660" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>