<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx</link><description>Following SP1 Update 1, UAG now supports publishing of Lync. This, however, has some important considerations that need to be followed, with regards to the trunk configuration and the certificates. Even though the Lync application can be added to ANY</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3571423</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:22:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3571423</guid><dc:creator>aputnam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You recommend publishing Lync into a separate trunk. How do you address the issue of the Lync trunk going on the same IP and port as the other trunks (exchange)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3571423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3540496</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:15:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3540496</guid><dc:creator>Ben Ari</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;To Bill and others, the blog comments are not the appropriate platform for asking technical questions, esp. outside the scope of the article. Please post your questions on the UAG support forum at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/forefrontedgeiag"&gt;social.technet.microsoft.com/.../forefrontedgeiag&lt;/a&gt; or contact me directly via the Email Blog Author link on the top right of the page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3540496" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3540422</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:26:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3540422</guid><dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. &amp;nbsp;Can the same wildcard cert be applied to multiple trunks? &amp;nbsp;I would assume as different needs will require different authentication methods and each trunk can only have a single type of authentication that it would be necessary to apply the wildcard cert across many trunks. &amp;nbsp;So, will a single wildcard cert be enough to accomplish any type of publishing needs on the UAG?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am thinking of Lync in particular. &amp;nbsp;It would be easier to be able to use a single wildcard cert on the UAG so I don&amp;#39;t have to worry about what needs to be included in the SAN for different trunks publishing OWA, Outlook Anywhere, Sharepoint, Intranets, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would then only need a particular SAN cert on the Lync Edge since that will have externally facing IPs to accomplish other Lync client needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does that make sense?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One last question regarding certs. &amp;nbsp;I currently use ISA 2006 to publish my Exchange services (OWA, ActiveSync, Etc.). &amp;nbsp;Both my ISA2006 and Exchange Server have certs installed so they can communicate. &amp;nbsp;Am I correct that when using UAG to publish Exchange services like OWA, Outlook Anywhere, ActiveSync, etc. that I no longer need certs on the Exchange box since once a client reaches the UAG box traffic from the UAG to Exchange can be over standard http?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bill&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3540422" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3539902</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:05:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3539902</guid><dc:creator>Mike L</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt B, I am running this configuration with a wildcard cert and it works fine for Lync 2010 and Lync mobile clients (I do have a SAN cert for the Lync edge server though). &amp;nbsp;I have not tested other devices (such as Lync phones). &amp;nbsp;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3539902" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3520004</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:37:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3520004</guid><dc:creator>Matt B</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is the requirements for a non-wildcard cert for Lync specific to UAG? Because we are publishing Lync via TMG with a wildcard certificate just fine. That would be disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3520004" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3499625</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3499625</guid><dc:creator>Ben Ari</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m afraid UAG does not have the ability to do this when connecting to the URL directly. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3499625" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3499520</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 06:15:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3499520</guid><dc:creator>Cajuntank</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have this resolved thanks to your reply with the exception of when I go to the site now from the Internet, I am having to append the url with the the /dialin to get to the page even though the application url clearly has that in there. Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3499520" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3499181</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:24:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3499181</guid><dc:creator>Ben Ari</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;UAG needs it&amp;#39;s own, separate public hostname, that&amp;#39;s different than the names used by the application. This allows UAG to identify requests that pertain to UAG&amp;#39;s administrative website (InternalSite). You can access Lync by using it&amp;#39;s public hostname, but the UAG needs the hostname as well. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3499181" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3499137</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:30:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3499137</guid><dc:creator>Cajuntank</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am new to TMG and UAG, so excuse me if I&amp;#39;m not even close on this, but you&amp;#39;re including the public host name in the SAN certificate due to you wanting to go through the portal address instead of the primary publishing URL. Can you not use the primary publishing FQDN of Lync (ie...lyncweb.domain.com) as the public host name and wouldn&amp;#39;t need to have yet another name in the certificate?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3499137" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lync publishing on UAG</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ben/archive/2012/02/13/lync-publishing-on-uag.aspx#3496127</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:18:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3496127</guid><dc:creator>Erez Ben Ari</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Answer to RenhsrakJ: This was a type in the image, and I&amp;#39;ve replaced it with the correct one. Thank you for bringing this to my attention!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Erez&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3496127" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>