<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization issues using Tracelog.exe</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2012/01/20/troubleshooting-high-cpu-utilization-issues-using-tracelog-exe.aspx</link><description>Good day AskPerf! Vinod Rawat here to discuss/demonstrate the benefits of using the Tracelog.exe utility to troubleshoot High CPU issues. Tracelog.exe is a command line utility that allows us to start/stop or enable trace logging, and offers the following</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization issues using Tracelog.exe</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2012/01/20/troubleshooting-high-cpu-utilization-issues-using-tracelog-exe.aspx#3477700</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:36:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3477700</guid><dc:creator>sergmat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the NT Kernel Logger session is already in use, the StartTrace func returns ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3477700" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization issues using Tracelog.exe</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2012/01/20/troubleshooting-high-cpu-utilization-issues-using-tracelog-exe.aspx#3476785</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:32:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3476785</guid><dc:creator>Blake Morrison - MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oscar, this was a mistake which has been corrected. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3476785" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization issues using Tracelog.exe</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2012/01/20/troubleshooting-high-cpu-utilization-issues-using-tracelog-exe.aspx#3476694</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:28:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3476694</guid><dc:creator>Oscar Virot</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just a question, Is there an error in the last paragraph. First you write that more than 88.25% is taking 25 seconds which is really long time and then later microseconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3476694" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization issues using Tracelog.exe</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2012/01/20/troubleshooting-high-cpu-utilization-issues-using-tracelog-exe.aspx#3476458</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:42:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3476458</guid><dc:creator>Koby Kahane</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Any reason to prefer tracelog/tracerpt over xperf?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3476458" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>