http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2010/03/30/perfmon-identifying-processes-by-pid-instead-of-instance.aspx&#160; Hello all, Ashish here with a brief discussion about an issue you may have seen when using Perfmon to monitor system performance. When you use Perfmon to monitor multiple instances of the same process, you have probably noticed that it differentiatesen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2010/03/30/perfmon-identifying-processes-by-pid-instead-of-instance.aspx#3377627Wed, 29 Dec 2010 06:47:19 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3377627hamzah<p>Dude you are a genious. You got me out of a bottleneck. Thanks</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3377627" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2010/03/30/perfmon-identifying-processes-by-pid-instead-of-instance.aspx#3324193Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:45:21 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3324193Rob<p>Just wanted to say thanks for this perfmon tip, it&#39;s really saved me some time!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3324193" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2010/03/30/perfmon-identifying-processes-by-pid-instead-of-instance.aspx#3322091Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:49:09 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3322091D<p>Thanks for the post, I tried this the other day but quickly realized that CLR .NET counters do not observe this setting. I tried the setting at the bottom of <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922775">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922775</a> which unfortunately does not work. Do you know of a way to have CLR .NET counters display pid #?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3322091" width="1" height="1">