http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/09/16/active-directory-site-topology-not-just-for-dcs.aspxMark here again. Following a recent experience in the field (yes, Premier Field Engineers leave the office), I thought it’d be useful to discuss Active Directory Topology and how it influences DFS Namespace and DFS Folder referrals. Let’s look at theen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/09/16/active-directory-site-topology-not-just-for-dcs.aspx#3453976Sun, 18 Sep 2011 01:02:30 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3453976Leonardo Côco<p>excellent post</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3453976" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/09/16/active-directory-site-topology-not-just-for-dcs.aspx#3453713Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:43:39 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3453713NedPyle [MSFT]<p style="text-align:right;">You can manually delete anything in there. Sometimes people do a big manual toplogy, but fail to complete a site matrix. The AD Topology Diagrammer is a useful tool to catch those mistakes, as well as visualize the whole thing.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3453713" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2011/09/16/active-directory-site-topology-not-just-for-dcs.aspx#3453709Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:20:41 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3453709Christian Schindler<p>Interessting Post. Only one question left: How come is it possible that a Site is not associated with at least on Site link? If I create a Site it is mandatory to specifiy a Site link... Christian</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3453709" width="1" height="1">