<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Are ADFS Binaries Installed on non-R2 Windows Server 2003 computers?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/12/08/why-are-adfs-binaries-installed-on-non-r2-windows-server-2003-computers.aspx</link><description>Hi, Warren here. I recently worked on a case where I got to do a bit of sleuthing. I found the results interesting and thought other Windows Server admins might notice the same thing this particular administrator had and wonder why. My customer has an</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Why Are ADFS Binaries Installed on non-R2 Windows Server 2003 computers?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/12/08/why-are-adfs-binaries-installed-on-non-r2-windows-server-2003-computers.aspx#3165965</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:57:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3165965</guid><dc:creator>Warren-MSFT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for raising that point. &amp;nbsp;I did not test a slipstreamed SP 2 build. I only tested going from SP1 to SP2 with and without .Net 2.0 installed on the target system. Time permitting I’ll run through a few passes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3165965" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Are ADFS Binaries Installed on non-R2 Windows Server 2003 computers?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/12/08/why-are-adfs-binaries-installed-on-non-r2-windows-server-2003-computers.aspx#3165936</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:35:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3165936</guid><dc:creator>Grimson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Quick test on my Windows 2003 Server non R2; only a empty windir%\ADFS folder exist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows was installed with SP2 binaries slipstreamed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3165936" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Server 2003: Why ADFS Binaries installed on non-R2 computers?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2008/12/08/why-are-adfs-binaries-installed-on-non-r2-windows-server-2003-computers.aspx#3165616</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:26:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3165616</guid><dc:creator>Windows Server 2003: Why ADFS Binaries installed on non-R2 computers?</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.ditii.com/2008/12/09/windows-server-2003-why-adfs-binaries-installed-on-non-r2-computers/"&gt;http://www.ditii.com/2008/12/09/windows-server-2003-why-adfs-binaries-installed-on-non-r2-computers/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3165616" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>