<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>An old-new way to get Group Policy Results</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/12/04/an-old-new-way-to-get-group-policy-results.aspx</link><description>Hi, Mike again. Here is the scenario: you’re sitting in front of a workstation that has been diagnosed with a Group Policy problem. You scurry to a command prompt and type the ever familiar GPRESULT.EXE and redirect the output to a text file. Then, proceed</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: An old-new way to get Group Policy Results</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/12/04/an-old-new-way-to-get-group-policy-results.aspx#3291715</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:34:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3291715</guid><dc:creator>jimydon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I should have said I was trying this on XP - apologies if there is a difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3291715" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An old-new way to get Group Policy Results</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/12/04/an-old-new-way-to-get-group-policy-results.aspx#3291705</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:04:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3291705</guid><dc:creator>jimydon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For LoggingFlags the values didn't work for me. i.e.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want to exclude computer results from the report data, then set LoggingFlags equal to 4096. If you want to exclude user results from the report data, then set LoggingFlags equal to 8192.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The values should be &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;const long RSOP_NO_COMPUTER &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; = 0x10000;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;const long RSOP_NO_USER &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; = 0x20000;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i.e &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RSOP_NO_COMPUTER = 65536 &amp;lt;- tried this fine&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RSOP_NO_USER = 131072 &amp;lt;-haven't tried this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3291705" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>‘Tis the Season to read about Group Policy </title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/12/04/an-old-new-way-to-get-group-policy-results.aspx#2682388</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 01:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2682388</guid><dc:creator>Group Policy Team Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you gearing up for a new year of administering Group Policy, here's some links to articles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2682388" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An old-new way to get Group Policy Results</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/12/04/an-old-new-way-to-get-group-policy-results.aspx#2629671</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:13:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2629671</guid><dc:creator>Comprox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You gave me no other choice Ned. I am sorry to have to use comments, but hopefully you get this. Drop me a line if you remember the youngin' Comprox: comprox [at) gmail dottt com. Sorry for the spam :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2629671" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>