http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspxHi, Ned here. I&rsquo;m a Technical Lead in Directory Services out of Charlotte, NC. Today I&rsquo;m going to talk a little bit about a common customer question: how do I leverage group policy to deploy custom registry settings? I&rsquo;ll be showingen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#3368368Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:09:03 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3368368NedPyle [MSFT]<p>Nope. GPP became a much better solution in the meantime and we wrote about that a lot.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3368368" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#3368241Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:37:16 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3368241Seth Technet<p>Ned, did you ever get around to posting about ADMX templates? &nbsp;Tried searching the rest of the blog but could not find the promised follow-up article.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3368241" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#3156660Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:31:28 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3156660Ask the Directory Services Team<p>We’ve been at this for over a year (since August 2007), with more than 100 posts (127 to be exact), so</p> <img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3156660" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#2988603Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:43:55 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2988603Ask the Directory Services Team<p>Ned here again. Today I&amp;#8217;m going to talk about a new feature of Windows Server 2008 and Windows</p> <img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2988603" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#1755283Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:05:27 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1755283Forrest<p>Great article, read more... ...</p> <img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1755283" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#1753803Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:37:39 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1753803NedPyle [MSFT]<p>Hi!</p> <p>Great question. I chose to write about ADM because:</p> <p>1. It works on anything (2000, XP, 2003, Vista, 2008).</p> <p>2. It's pretty well documented at this point (just hard to find those docs sometimes)</p> <p>3. The ADM paradigm is easier to swallow than the XML format (although this will change as time goes by).</p> <p>4. I'm writing another followup on ADMX. :-)</p> <p>Definitely coming!</p> <p>-Ned</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1753803" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2007/08/14/deploying-custom-registry-changes-through-group-policy.aspx#1753678Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:11:33 GMTd5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:1753678lukasbeeler<p>Very good read. Thanks!</p> <p>I have one question, though. Why are you using the old .adm format instead of the new admx/adml format? It's a bit more cumbersome to write by hand, but i would've loved to see some hands on by the exports on it...</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1753678" width="1" height="1">