<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx</link><description>Windows Server 2008 R2 has been publicly available now for only a short period of time, but we are already seeing a good adoption rate for the new Live Migration functionality as well as the new Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV) feature. I personally have</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3352822</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:49:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3352822</guid><dc:creator>Marty Chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, can we do &amp;quot;Refresh virtual machine configuration&amp;quot; action from SCVMM? I am asking this because now that SCVMM manages every Hyper-V servers in a domain (including clustered hyper-v hosts), it makes sense to have this action available in SCVMM in order to provide unified user experience for our customers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know this is probable a SCVMM-domain question, but could you verify this for us?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marty@CSS-TW&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3352822" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3315025</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:11:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3315025</guid><dc:creator>Yv4n</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, very nice post ! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;please can you confirm or not that protocols &amp;quot;Client for Microsoft Networks&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;File and Printer Sharing for Microsoft Networks&amp;quot; should be enabled on ISCSI Network Card. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Usually, i disable it because iscsi dont need it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks . &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3315025" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3301774</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:34:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3301774</guid><dc:creator>Stefano_C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought that CSV was a requisite for Live migration but I've been told that it is not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is that true ? Does it work with normal clustered LUN as well ? What about the problem of having one host locking the LUN ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using CSV I didn't find a way to backup the VM residing on CSV volume as it seems that VSS does not work with CSV &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3301774" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3301772</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:14:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3301772</guid><dc:creator>Stefano_C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you add info about configuration check and modification in server Core environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've been using R2 Core as host operating system and even if I got live migration working properly I'd like to check if I followed all the best practices &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stefano&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3301772" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3300487</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:00:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3300487</guid><dc:creator>Bluvg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the Cluster and Live Migration networks were both supposed to be dedicated networks (NICs). &amp;nbsp;So sharing the Live Migration and Cluster networks is supported/best practice? &amp;nbsp;I'd love to free up another NIC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3300487" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3299852</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:36:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3299852</guid><dc:creator>tanerultanir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;great article. Thx...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3299852" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx#3299678</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:54:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3299678</guid><dc:creator>Nóri</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;And how would those unfortunate souls that installed Server Core perform the network card configuration steps ? :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3299678" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>