<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Expected Snapshot Merge Behavior for a Highly Available VM</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/05/29/expected-snapshot-merge-behavior-for-a-highly-available-vm.aspx</link><description>Hello m y name is Sean Dwyer, and I'm a Support Escalation Engineer working in the Windows CORE team here at Microsoft. While working with snapshots that are attached to a highly available VM in a Cluster, you may notice after deleting a snapshot, it</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Expected Snapshot Merge Behavior for a Highly Available VM</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/05/29/expected-snapshot-merge-behavior-for-a-highly-available-vm.aspx#3266308</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:17:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3266308</guid><dc:creator>sunraykurien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does the setting for offline actions have to be changed for each machine in the evironment separtely, or is there a way to do this for a set of computers at one shot? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3266308" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Expected Snapshot Merge Behavior for a Highly Available VM</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/05/29/expected-snapshot-merge-behavior-for-a-highly-available-vm.aspx#3259026</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:05:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259026</guid><dc:creator>Stefano_C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm following with interest the improvement of Hyperv but sadly I've to admit I'm a little disappointed by the lack of integration between Hyper-V and clustering service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it has to compete , seriously , with vmware'esx ( now vsphere ) much improvements should be made.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly taking down a HA VM from Hyperv console or SCVVM should &amp;quot;trigger&amp;quot; something in cluster service which prevent it from restarting the VM ( as it would in a real failure case ) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should not be accepted manual intervention int &amp;quot;option tab&amp;quot; of the clustered resource.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second the snapshot feature is long behind the vmware counterpart. Is it acceptable that VM has to be taken down &amp;quot;only&amp;quot; to delete a snapshot ? I realy think is not &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as I know such problems still apply on upcoming R2 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stefano Colombo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3259026" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Expected Snapshot Merge Behavior for a Highly Available VM</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/05/29/expected-snapshot-merge-behavior-for-a-highly-available-vm.aspx#3259025</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:05:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3259025</guid><dc:creator>Stefano_C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm following with interest the improvement of Hyperv but sadly I've to admit I'm a little disappointed by the lack of integration between Hyper-V and clustering service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it has to compete , seriously , with vmware'esx ( now vsphere ) much improvements should be made.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly taking down a HA VM from Hyperv console or SCVVM should &amp;quot;trigger&amp;quot; something in cluster service which prevent it from restarting the VM ( as it would in a real failure case ) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should not be accepted manual intervention int &amp;quot;option tab&amp;quot; of the clustered resource.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second the snapshot feature is long behind the vmware counterpart. Is it acceptable that VM has to be taken down &amp;quot;only&amp;quot; to delete a snapshot ? I realy think is not &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as I know such problems still apply on upcoming R2 &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stefano Colombo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3259025" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Expected Snapshot Merge Behavior for a Highly Available VM</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/05/29/expected-snapshot-merge-behavior-for-a-highly-available-vm.aspx#3248539</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:38:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3248539</guid><dc:creator>mcshinsky</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This way works, but if you choose shutdown within the cluster administrator, not Hyper-V manager or within the VM itself, the VM will stay shutdown allowing the merge to happen. &amp;nbsp;Also, if you use SCVMM and choose shutdown from the SCVMM console, the VM will also stay shutdown even in a clustered config. &amp;nbsp;This will also allow the merge to happen. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3248539" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>