<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Virtualisation for the DBA part 1 -  Are you Bovvered?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/10/16/virtualisation-for-the-dba-part-1-are-you-bovvered.aspx</link><description>&amp;#160; I have been at a couple of trade shows over the last couple of weeks and a consistent theme has emerged, the reluctance of DBA’s to virtualise SQL Server, whether or not that is Hyper-V.&amp;#160; If you fall into this camp please read-on… Hopefully</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Virtualisation for the DBA part 1 -  Are you Bovvered?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/10/16/virtualisation-for-the-dba-part-1-are-you-bovvered.aspx#3296511</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3296511</guid><dc:creator>ashley denton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;great article really enjoyed it, i've been looking into ways in which my business could implement a virtualisation strategy and i'm very much looking forward to where it will go in the future, this is a good article which i came accross &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://bit.ly/futurevirtualisation"&gt;http://bit.ly/futurevirtualisation&lt;/a&gt; looking forward to reading more of your articles in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3296511" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Virtualisation for the DBA part 1 -  Are you Bovvered?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/10/16/virtualisation-for-the-dba-part-1-are-you-bovvered.aspx#3288140</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:10:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3288140</guid><dc:creator>Andrew.Fryer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris thanks and do feel free to ping me directly if you need anything more on this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3288140" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Virtualisation for the DBA part 1 -  Are you Bovvered?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/10/16/virtualisation-for-the-dba-part-1-are-you-bovvered.aspx#3287594</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:57:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3287594</guid><dc:creator>Chris Dearden</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy , I may have been one of the people you've been chatting too on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the idea's we've considered is a specific low density virtualisation layer for Virtualising SQL - possibly going as low as 1-1 ( reason being some workloads that are not supported in a MSCS environment - and having Virtual Machine layer clustering is better than nothing ) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3287594" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>