<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>No SQL</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/07/03/no-sql.aspx</link><description>One of the fundamental dichotomies in development is the relational world of the database and the object orientated world of services, which sadly spills over into developers and DBA’s not always being the best of friends.&amp;#160; Developers don't always</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: No SQL</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/07/03/no-sql.aspx#3279029</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:56:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3279029</guid><dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I created a &amp;quot;No SQL&amp;quot; t-shirt and mug on CafePress with 0% markup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can find them here: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.cafepress.com/nosql&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ryan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3279029" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: No SQL</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/07/03/no-sql.aspx#3273537</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:56:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3273537</guid><dc:creator>Suri Nath</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice perspective Andrew. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One suggestion: Please QC the contents further to eliminate small spelling/grammer issues. (for example: there are two &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;and it got me thinking would the the world in general and the IT industry be better off without it&amp;quot;). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3273537" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: No SQL</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/07/03/no-sql.aspx#3261803</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:16:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3261803</guid><dc:creator>Steve Bennett</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting blog Andrew - thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have also thought about this issue on my blog and - from a data warehouse managers perspective - the NoSQL discussions are interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3261803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>