<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL Server standard edition in a virtual world</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/04/28/sql-server-standard-edition-in-a-virtual-world.aspx</link><description>One of the limitations of SQL Server is that it only supports 4 processors (as you can see here ).&amp;#160; That translates into 4 virtual processors if you run standard edition in a virtual machine.&amp;#160; If there are more than four processors available</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>SQL Server versions side by side</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2009/04/28/sql-server-standard-edition-in-a-virtual-world.aspx#3239494</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:50:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3239494</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Fryer's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are occasions where you need multiple versions of SQL Server running at the same time and you may&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3239494" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>