<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL Server 2008 Intellisense support for SQL 2000/5</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/08/11/sql-server-2008-intellisense-support-for-sql-2000-5.aspx</link><description>Intellisense for SQL, how hard is that?&amp;#160; Well judging for how long we have been asking for it the answer is “very”. Also talking to the product team it is actually much harder than for C# VB etc. because of the nature of SQL.&amp;#160; Anyway intellisense</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: SQL Server 2008 Intellisense support for SQL 2000/5</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/08/11/sql-server-2008-intellisense-support-for-sql-2000-5.aspx#3162889</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:52:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3162889</guid><dc:creator>Casmer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=341872"&gt;https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=341872&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They have a connect bug on it, go vote for it. Its one way to get MS to change their mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3162889" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server 2008 Intellisense support for SQL 2000/5</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/08/11/sql-server-2008-intellisense-support-for-sql-2000-5.aspx#3113236</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:25:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3113236</guid><dc:creator>Kam</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I also think this function should be kept. Just let the user decide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, it is a good place to &amp;quot;promote&amp;quot; 2008 because developers may find many new feature available only in 2008 when IntelliSense show the available command/functions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3113236" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server 2008 Intellisense support for SQL 2000/5</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/08/11/sql-server-2008-intellisense-support-for-sql-2000-5.aspx#3104237</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:38:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3104237</guid><dc:creator>Andrew.Fryer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Alunjd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am pretty sure you can't, so upgrade to SQL 2008 and put it ihnot 2005 compatibility mode would be my top tip&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3104237" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server 2008 Intellisense support for SQL 2000/5</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/08/11/sql-server-2008-intellisense-support-for-sql-2000-5.aspx#3104162</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:18:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3104162</guid><dc:creator>Alunjd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;is there a way to keep the CTP5 version?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;or some 'hack' to enable intellisense for the RTM?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to use it (knowing the compatiblity issues) for 2005.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3104162" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>