<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SQL Server 2008, 9 or 10?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/02/07/sql-server-2008-9-or-10.aspx</link><description>I am in soggy Seattle this week with a bunch of like minded SQL squirrels, so our super Tuesday was watching the product teams including, Ted Kummert , Donald Farmer and&amp;#160; Christian Kleinerman putting the latest refresh of SQL Server 2008 through</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>  No SQL Server 2008 until at least Q3 : techamber</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/andrew/archive/2008/02/07/sql-server-2008-9-or-10.aspx#2918793</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:17:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2918793</guid><dc:creator>  No SQL Server 2008 until at least Q3 : techamber</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.techamber.com/2008/02/21/no-sql-server-2008-until-at-least-q3/"&gt;http://www.techamber.com/2008/02/21/no-sql-server-2008-until-at-least-q3/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2918793" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>