<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What's in a name?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ad/archive/2008/02/27/what-s-in-a-name.aspx</link><description>Have you ever heard the Shakespeare paraphrased saying “a rose by any other name is still a rose?”. Well, the same holds true for objects in AD. Not that we have “rose” class objects, but the point being that simply renaming an object doesn’t really fundamentally</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: What's in a name?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ad/archive/2008/02/27/what-s-in-a-name.aspx#3369988</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 03:40:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3369988</guid><dc:creator>snoopz1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Exchange 2007 not allowing send and receive from the built in Administrator account&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is there a way to make buil-in administrator account work in this case ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;especially for smtp authenticate relay in exchange 2007 ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;exchange 2003 never have this restriction...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/Exchange/microsoft.public.exchange.admin/2008-06/msg00542.html"&gt;www.tech-archive.net/.../msg00542.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb218360(EXCHG.80).aspx"&gt;technet.microsoft.com/.../bb218360(EXCHG.80).aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3369988" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What's in a name?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/ad/archive/2008/02/27/what-s-in-a-name.aspx#3042223</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:12:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3042223</guid><dc:creator>Tim Springston [MS]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been asked to clarify things a bit. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The renamed Adminsitrator account will only have difficulty emailing with IMAP or POP3. &amp;nbsp;The built-in Administrator account can log in to its own mailbox via Outlook in regular MAPI mode and send/receive e-mail just fine, and Outlook Web Access (OWA) also works just fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Technet article which talks about this more isat the following link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996347"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996347&lt;/a&gt;(EXCHG.80).aspx &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3042223" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>