<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Access Denied: The Business of Security - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/</link><description /><dc:language /><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: LCS Server, SIP and ISA Server 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/10/419279.aspx#419301</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:14:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419301</guid><dc:creator>TBART</dc:creator><description>You are correct - that was a major Typo. &amp;nbsp;I re-worded that section a couple times and that slipped up. &amp;nbsp;I have corrected it, thank you!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419301" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: LCS Server, SIP and ISA Server 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/10/419279.aspx#419292</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:16:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419292</guid><dc:creator>tshinder</dc:creator><description>Hi Tom -- you made a major typo:&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;Placing machines in a domain limits manageability, policy application, auditing, monitoring, access control and authorization options&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;You should have said that placing machines in a WORKGROUP limits your options and reduces your overall security posture.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419292" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>LCS Server, SIP and ISA Server 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/10/419279.aspx#419283</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:31:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419283</guid><dc:creator>Access Denied: The Business of Security by Tom Bartlett</dc:creator><description>Here I summarize my thoughts&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;on providing secure and feature rich external access to LCS utilizing...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419283" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>LCS Server, SIP and ISA Server 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419068.aspx#419280</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:26:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419280</guid><dc:creator>Access Denied: The Business of Security by Tom Bartlett</dc:creator><description>Mixing these technologies together has a mixed story behind them and can lead you into all kind of quagmires.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419280" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bluecoat et la desinformation : Ils sont forts :-)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419074.aspx#419117</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:27:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419117</guid><dc:creator>Stanislas Quastana's WebLog on TechNet</dc:creator><description>Les informations pr&amp;amp;#233;sentes sur ce post sont fournies en l&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;&amp;amp;#233;tat et n&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;engagent que ma personne...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419117" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bluecoat et la desinformation : Ils sont forts :-)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419074.aspx#419115</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:26:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419115</guid><dc:creator>Stanislas Quastana's WebLog</dc:creator><description>Les informations pr&amp;amp;#233;sentes sur ce post sont fournies en l&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;&amp;amp;#233;tat et n&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;engagent que ma personne...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419115" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bluecoat et la d&amp;amp;#233;sinformation : Ils sont forts :-)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419074.aspx#419111</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:17:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419111</guid><dc:creator>Stanislas Quastana's WebLog on TechNet</dc:creator><description>Les informations pr&amp;amp;#233;sentes sur ce post sont fournies en l&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;&amp;amp;#233;tat et n&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;engagent que ma personne...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419111" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bluecoat et la d&amp;amp;#233;sinformation : Ils sont forts :-)</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419074.aspx#419108</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:16:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419108</guid><dc:creator>Stanislas Quastana's WebLog</dc:creator><description>Les informations pr&amp;amp;#233;sentes sur ce post sont fournies en l&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;&amp;amp;#233;tat et n&amp;amp;amp;rsquo;engagent que ma personne...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419108" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Application Layer Firewalls and ISA Server 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419068.aspx#419079</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419079</guid><dc:creator>ferrix</dc:creator><description>Can I get an AMEN?!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I used a pix for several years and I was continually frustrated by its lack of features and difficulty to configure. &amp;nbsp;The features I wanted seemed like they were always &amp;quot;coming in the next revision&amp;quot; from Cisco.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With ISA I can just build new features for it if I want to, and the configuration is way more fun to use. =)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419079" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Application Layer Firewalls and ISA Server 2004</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/accessdenied/archive/2006/02/08/419068.aspx#419070</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 06:13:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:419070</guid><dc:creator>Access Denied: The Business of Security by Tom Bartlett</dc:creator><description>I have posted my first (of what should be many articles) on my new blog site!&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Read about (and comment...&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=419070" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>