<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Follow up on lag sites... sort of.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2008/11/15/follow-up-on-lag-sites-sort-of.aspx</link><description>Ned here again. We recently had a very lively discussion about 'Lag Sites' as a disaster recovery option. If you've been digging around the MS Download Center, you may have already come across Introduction to Windows Server 2008 R2 . After some digging,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Secure Citrix Systems  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Ask the Directory Services Team : Follow up on lag sites&amp;#8230; sort of.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2008/11/15/follow-up-on-lag-sites-sort-of.aspx#3154294</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:46:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3154294</guid><dc:creator>Secure Citrix Systems  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Ask the Directory Services Team : Follow up on lag sites&amp;#8230; sort of.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.safewordfordforcitrix.com/ask-the-directory-services-team-follow-up-on-lag-sites-sort-of"&gt;http://www.safewordfordforcitrix.com/ask-the-directory-services-team-follow-up-on-lag-sites-sort-of&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>BlogMS Weekly Articles Published – 10th November 2008 to 16th November 2008</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2008/11/15/follow-up-on-lag-sites-sort-of.aspx#3155321</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:27:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3155321</guid><dc:creator>BlogMS - Official Microsoft Team Blogs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;203 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 94 blogs have new articles in the past 7 days. 223 new articles found&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Follow up on lag sites... sort of.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2008/11/15/follow-up-on-lag-sites-sort-of.aspx#3157958</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:46:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3157958</guid><dc:creator>Guido Grillenmeier</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Fully agree that the Recycle Bin feature will be really great, once companies have reached that Win2008 R2 Forest Functional level and enabled this feature. I think it will actually be one of those special features that will drive admins to move to R2, as fast as they can, though this naturally takes some time in large, multi domain forests... I.e. those forests, that benefit the most from this feature ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be good to hear comments from others about what their expectations are on the AD recycle bin. For example, would companies want to be able to control that specific data is removed right away from a deleted object (one that's in a state which allows to be recovered online), or is it ok to always keep all attributes until full removal of the object in the AD database a few weeks later? &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>