<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>High Accuracy W32time Requirements</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx</link><description>Hello there. I’m Bob Drake from Microsoft’s Directory Services Team. Quite often we get inquiries on how to configure networks for high accuracy time needs. In some cases, customers want the time accurate down to the second. There are a lot of occasions</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Ghillie Suits &amp;raquo; Ask the Directory Services Team : High Accuracy W32time Requirements</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#2276188</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:18:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2276188</guid><dc:creator>Ghillie Suits » Ask the Directory Services Team : High Accuracy W32time Requirements</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://ghillie-suits.info/?p=40823"&gt;http://ghillie-suits.info/?p=40823&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: High Accuracy W32time Requirements</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#2475536</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:32:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2475536</guid><dc:creator>andrea_scintilla</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Spect.le DS Team,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;anyway, wich are best w32Time registry settings to get most high accuracy possible?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2 seconds instead of 4 could be a good result for us.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: High Accuracy W32time Requirements</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#2477409</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:24:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2477409</guid><dc:creator>NedPyle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrea,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We actually don't like to get into specifics with regards to high accuracy time, because we flat out cannot guarantee they will stay consistent using the x86/x64 motherboards real-time clock. All we will guarantee from a support standpoint is 300 seconds, so that Kerberos will function.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are really looking for that 1-2 second kind of accuracy, we always recommend you invest in replacement hardware clocks that override the PC's RTC and give you extreme accuracy (think nanoseconds).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That being said, you can look over &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/b43a025f-cce2-4c82-b3ea-3b95d482db3a1033.mspx"&gt;http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/b43a025f-cce2-4c82-b3ea-3b95d482db3a1033.mspx&lt;/a&gt; for a complete list of the time registry settings and how they can be used to try and get time closer to a few seconds of drift. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Ned&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: High Accuracy W32time Requirements</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#2572756</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:2572756</guid><dc:creator>bobdrake</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Once again I would have to point to an alternate time solution for your needs. &amp;nbsp;W32time was not designed to maintain that degreee of accuracy. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you wanted to test registry keys since an alternate method could not be accomplished you can test adjusting the keys noted (again this is not guaranteed):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PhaseCorrectRate &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MinPollInterval &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MaxPollInterval &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UpdateInterval &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taken from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/b43a025f-cce2-4c82-b3ea-3b95d482db3a1033.mspx?mfr=true"&gt;http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/b43a025f-cce2-4c82-b3ea-3b95d482db3a1033.mspx?mfr=true&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PhaseCorrectRate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Registry path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Config&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows XP and Windows Server 2003&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This entry controls the rate at which the phase error is corrected. Specifying a small value corrects the phase error quickly, but might cause the clock to become unstable. If the value is too large, it takes a longer time to correct the phase error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The default value on domain members is 1. The default value on stand-alone clients and servers is 7.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MinPollInterval&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Registry path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Config&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows XP and Windows Server 2003&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This entry specifies the smallest interval, in log2 seconds, allowed for the system polling interval. Note that while a system does not request samples more frequently than this, a provider can produce samples at times other than the scheduled interval. The default value for domain controllers is 6. The default value for domain members is 10. The default value for stand-alone clients and servers is 10.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MaxPollInterval&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Registry path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Config&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows XP and Windows Server 2003&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This entry specifies the largest interval, in log2 seconds, allowed for the system polling interval. Note that while a system must poll according to the scheduled interval, a provider can refuse to produce samples when requested to do so. The default value for domain controllers is 10. The default value for domain members is 15. The default value for stand-alone clients and servers is 15. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;UpdateInterval&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Registry path&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W32Time\Config&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Windows XP and Windows Server 2003&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This entry specifies the number of clock ticks between phase correction adjustments. The default value for domain controllers is 100. The default value for domain members is 30,000. The default value for stand-alone clients and servers is 360,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Bob&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>High accuracy time, and why we don't support it</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#3069120</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:46:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3069120</guid><dc:creator>Windows Time Service</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;More than any other, the most often asked question of the Windows Time Service is &amp;quot;How do I configure&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>What W32tm is it anyway?</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#3135106</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:50:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3135106</guid><dc:creator>Brian W. McCann</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;My daughter Alyssa and I play a game…well she might not consider it a game but she is constantly&amp;amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: High Accuracy W32time Requirements</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2007/10/23/high-accuracy-w32time-requirements.aspx#3221432</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:34:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:3221432</guid><dc:creator>hgerstung</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot for taking the time to answer this questions. We experience quite a lot of inquiries from Windows users exactly asking the same question. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our standard answer exactly matches your reply (Kerberos, better than 5 min) although we sometimes see better results with W32time and our time server appliances. For customers requiring a better accuracy, we offer a Windows port of Dave Mills' reference implementation of NTP, i.e. the very same code that runs on almost every Unix-based OS around, and that does a very good job (better than 100ms), although we still experience problems with Vista (working on that).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only drawback with using NTP on Windows instead of W32time is the fact that automatic time synchronization does not work, i.e. the workstations do not automatically determine the domain controller as a time server, most probably because the NTP service does not register itself in the directory as a time source. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If someone from Microsoft would be willing to spend some time on this and assist us (the NTP opensource project AKA ntp.org), please contact me at heiko dot gerstung at meinberg dot de !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, thanks for your article, a good reference to point customers to!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;Heiko&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>