<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Hello world</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2007/03/15/hello-world.aspx</link><description>printf(“hello world\n”); This is Jimmy Kuo of the Microsoft Security Research &amp;amp; Response team (MSRR). (What a wonderful thing to say and see written down.). Recently, there have been some tests that have brought into question the detection capability</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>.:Computer Defense:. &amp;raquo; Microsoft Responds to AV Attacks</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2007/03/15/hello-world.aspx#696267</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:51:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:696267</guid><dc:creator>.:Computer Defense:. » Microsoft Responds to AV Attacks</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=290"&gt;http://www.computerdefense.org/?p=290&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Mr.</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2007/03/15/hello-world.aspx#696706</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:57:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:696706</guid><dc:creator>Adam Minter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. &amp;nbsp;I don't know whether to applaud or weep. On one hand, Microsoft finally concedes that it is selling an inferior product that needs significant improvement. &amp;nbsp;On the other hand ... Microsoft finally conceds that it is selling an inferior product that needs significant improvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this were medicine, these people would lost their malpractice insurance. How on Earth can Jimmy Kuo and Microsoft get off promoting their security suite when even they concede that others are doing a better job? Are customers supposed to take heart and security from this amazingly pathetic promise:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You will see our results gradually and steadily increase until they are on par with the other majors in this arena. &amp;nbsp;And soon after, they will need to catch up to us!&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is that supposed to be funny? &amp;nbsp;Ironic? &amp;nbsp;OneCare customers are supposed to finance this kind of incompetence? Seriously, if you look at the way that Microsoft promotes this software, and then you look at Kuo's statement, I think any reasonably competent lawyer could put together an air-tight fraud case. &amp;nbsp;An absolute new low for Microsoft. &amp;nbsp;Pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adam Minter&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Microsoft Anti-Malware Team Lives!</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2007/03/15/hello-world.aspx#696754</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:52:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:696754</guid><dc:creator>Corrine</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for addressing this. &amp;nbsp;I look forward to follow-up articles as well as more frequent reporting. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pingback: &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://securitygarden.blogspot.com/2007/03/microsoft-anti-malware-team-lives.html"&gt;http://securitygarden.blogspot.com/2007/03/microsoft-anti-malware-team-lives.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Corrine&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft: OneCare should not have been rolled out</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2007/03/15/hello-world.aspx#697557</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:35:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:697557</guid><dc:creator>Donna's SecurityFlash</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has said that its OneCare security suite has &amp;quot;a problem&amp;quot; with the underlying antivirus code,&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>OneCare malware detection update</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2007/03/15/hello-world.aspx#698489</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 03:59:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:698489</guid><dc:creator>LiveSide - News blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There's been lots of talk about Windows Live OneCare in the last two weeks, particularly around its poor&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>