<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>News on Alcan, Mywife.E</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx</link><description>In Bill Gates' keynote at RSA in February, one of the subjects he spoke on was the ability for Microsoft to have a comprehensive view of the evolving threat landscape using the information and feedback from such tools as Hotmail, Watson, the Windows Malicious</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Guess what was the most prevalent infection detected by February's Malicious Software Removal Tool</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx#424174</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:35:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:424174</guid><dc:creator>Spyware Sucks</dc:creator><description>According to the Anti-Malware Engineering Team, the&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;Malicious Software Removal Tool (&amp;amp;quot;MSRT&amp;amp;quot;)&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;is...</description></item><item><title>Security Exposure - it's your behaviour, not your system</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx#424224</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:57:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:424224</guid><dc:creator>Tales from the Crypto</dc:creator><description>Along the lines of the new theory of child-raising, where you teach that &amp;amp;quot;Stranger&amp;amp;quot; is a behaviour, not...</description></item><item><title>re: News on Alcan, Mywife.E</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx#424290</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:57:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:424290</guid><dc:creator>William Business Systems</dc:creator><description>Why not block the ip address at the router level of all company's that write these programs and where they are distributed?</description></item><item><title>re: William Business Systems' comment</title><link>http://blogs.technet.com/antimalware/archive/2006/04/03/424113.aspx#424439</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 05:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d5e57398-b9ef-4490-9955-07cbb4e4a80d:424439</guid><dc:creator>Adam Carmichael</dc:creator><description>Companies that write malware would not release it from their own network. It could be traced back to them. You're not dealing with skiddies, you are dealing with professionals that conduct themselves in a professional (albeit unethical) manner.</description></item></channel></rss>